Citigroup Inc. increased its stake in Skechers U.S.A., Inc. ( NYSE:SKX – Free Report ) by 0.1% during the third quarter, according to its most recent filing with the SEC. The fund owned 128,637 shares of the textile maker’s stock after buying an additional 171 shares during the quarter. Citigroup Inc. owned 0.09% of Skechers U.S.A. worth $8,608,000 at the end of the most recent quarter. Several other institutional investors also recently added to or reduced their stakes in the stock. Pacer Advisors Inc. boosted its stake in Skechers U.S.A. by 5,780.6% in the third quarter. Pacer Advisors Inc. now owns 2,639,390 shares of the textile maker’s stock valued at $176,628,000 after acquiring an additional 2,594,507 shares during the last quarter. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP lifted its stake in Skechers U.S.A. by 3.0% in the second quarter. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP now owns 1,885,723 shares of the textile maker’s stock valued at $130,350,000 after purchasing an additional 55,095 shares during the last quarter. Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc. grew its holdings in Skechers U.S.A. by 1.3% during the third quarter. Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc. now owns 1,316,882 shares of the textile maker’s stock valued at $88,126,000 after purchasing an additional 17,429 shares during the period. Coronation Fund Managers Ltd. increased its position in Skechers U.S.A. by 378.6% in the third quarter. Coronation Fund Managers Ltd. now owns 498,837 shares of the textile maker’s stock worth $33,382,000 after buying an additional 394,618 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Commerce Bank raised its stake in shares of Skechers U.S.A. by 949.5% in the third quarter. Commerce Bank now owns 467,774 shares of the textile maker’s stock valued at $31,303,000 after buying an additional 423,204 shares during the period. Institutional investors own 79.96% of the company’s stock. Skechers U.S.A. Trading Up 0.3 % Shares of SKX stock opened at $63.89 on Friday. The company has a market capitalization of $9.65 billion, a PE ratio of 15.74, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 0.88 and a beta of 1.23. Skechers U.S.A., Inc. has a 52-week low of $55.67 and a 52-week high of $75.09. The business’s fifty day moving average is $63.39 and its 200 day moving average is $66.11. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.01, a quick ratio of 1.25 and a current ratio of 1.96. Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades SKX has been the subject of several research reports. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft increased their price target on Skechers U.S.A. from $83.00 to $84.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research note on Friday, October 25th. Barclays lifted their target price on shares of Skechers U.S.A. from $79.00 to $80.00 and gave the stock an “overweight” rating in a research note on Friday, October 25th. StockNews.com lowered shares of Skechers U.S.A. from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a research report on Monday, November 25th. Morgan Stanley raised their price objective on shares of Skechers U.S.A. from $81.00 to $84.00 and gave the stock an “overweight” rating in a report on Friday, October 25th. Finally, Bank of America lowered their target price on shares of Skechers U.S.A. from $81.00 to $80.00 and set a “buy” rating on the stock in a report on Friday, October 25th. Two research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and eleven have given a buy rating to the company. Based on data from MarketBeat, the stock currently has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus price target of $78.09. View Our Latest Report on SKX About Skechers U.S.A. ( Free Report ) Skechers U.SA, Inc designs, develops, markets, and distributes footwear for men, women, and children worldwide. The company operates through Wholesale and Direct-to-Consumer segments. It offers footwear under Skechers Hands Free Slip-ins, Skechers Arch Fit, and Skechers Air-Cooled Memory Foam brands. Featured Stories Receive News & Ratings for Skechers U.S.A. Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Skechers U.S.A. and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .Home | News | Rewind Gaming Education Rewind: Gaming Education Higher education students are missing out on what could be an integral part of their learning journeys — play By Aditya Deshbandhu Published Date - 30 November 2024, 11:30 PM Dr Aditya Deshbandhu What can video games as media and interactive experiences offer tomorrow’s learning environments? The introduction of play, games and aspects of video games in learning environments as a practice is gaining momentum and becoming prevalent globally. As teachers and researchers alike try to understand how the use of playful approaches in education can benefit the learning journeys of students from pre-school environments to the higher education sector, it is important for us to acknowledge that the boundary between learning and play — once considered sacrosanct, is now blurry. Existing research has highlighted how aspects like joy, creativity, the development of goal-setting abilities and working towards achieving set goals are common to both learning and engaging with games. Similarly, psychologists examining learning environments that have adopted playful approaches have observed many positive effects among students irrespective of methods, content and contextual settings. Recent research in education has also highlighted how play is a crucial part of not just pre-school and early years of schooling but throughout one’s educational journey. Designing a course that draws on games and play also means that learning environments are less hierarchical, there is more room for debate, discussion and pre-class preparation In my research, I have found that incorporating play in the classroom and informal learning environments allows students to develop better communication abilities and initiative, and work better in large-group settings. The use of playful activities and games in classes has also been found to lead to a reduction of the fear of failure, fostering environments that could lead to students not just consuming knowledge but co-creating it with their learning facilitators. However, the current disposition in India’s higher education sector remains unconvinced of the benefits of games and game-based learning for the nation’s students. Though a few of our eminent centres of learning offer technical and development skills or even a full-fledged degree in game development/design, they choose to ignore the fact that video games is the largest media industry in the world in terms of revenue. There was almost no mention of the need to engage with game-based learning, pedagogic approaches determined by play, or even the game development industry in the New Education Policy of 2020. Policymakers and the government are yet to engage with the Indian gaming industry’s call to create necessary standards for game development, e-sports degrees and infrastructure for vocational and skill-based training. In the interim, Indian students miss out on what could be an integral part of their learning journeys – play. These are avenues for experiences that could spark curiosity and further critical and reflective learning, aspects deemed essential in workplaces geared for increasing degrees of automation in the next decade. Playful Twist However, this article reflects on more than what our students are missing out on by not finding room for games, game-based learning and playful approaches in curricula . Drawing a bit from my teaching journey, it showcases specific examples where the use of games in classroom environments has enhanced the learning experience at the university level. I teach video games-based courses at both the undergraduate and postgraduate levels. Over the last three years, as I have developed the courses, taught/delivered them, graded various assignments and engaged with students, I have observed a few key things: A few eminent centres of learning offer a full-fledged degree in game development/design but choose to ignore the fact that the video games is the largest media industry in the world in terms of revenue Levelling the classroom field Higher education classrooms are generally extremely diverse, be it internationally where students and teachers from a range of countries often feature in the room to Indian settings where the cohorts are diverse in terms of class, region, language, religion and background. In such diverse settings, I have observed that video games or playful activities are not just great at breaking the ice and getting the conversation flowing, but they also allow students to communicate with ease. In settings where language proficiency is a concern, I have witnessed games, through play and interactivity, bridge the gap between shyness and any awkwardness one might feel in one’s grasp of a specific language. Secondly, the incorporation of games into coursework offers students a shared set of experiences to bond over as well as a shared set of understandings to draw on when engaging with complex theories and ideas. For the teacher/facilitator, games can reduce the burden of integrating all the members of a classroom because the inherent interactivity games provide often means that students are searching through them for meaning, purpose and progression. If the integration of game-based learning initiatives improves in-class environments, it is essential to ask if the use of games could be developed to align with students’ desire to succeed in the Indian higher education setup. Collaboration and creative thinking Most games are designed as problem-solving environments and engaging with the right game in courses will encourage students to solve the problems the field poses in creative ways. It is necessary to reiterate that the use of games in curricula reduces the fear of failure among students which, in turn, allows them to experiment and explore beyond the scope of course outlines and prescribed learning materials. Looking beyond prescribed sources of learning is a great sign of initiative and often leads to very interesting explorations by students. There is almost no mention of the need to engage with game-based learning, pedagogic approaches determined by play, or even the game development industry in the New Education Policy I have had some very unconventional and thought-provoking assignments submitted to me where I have used games or play-based learning. Students have also been keener to work in teams, brainstorm ideas, and, at times, go over and beyond the deliverable learning outcomes that are designed for the course. Designing a course that draws on games and play also means that learning environments are less hierarchical, there is more room for debate, discussion and pre-class preparation. I have never had trouble with attendance and student participation in a course where I have used pedagogies of play. If the above benefits hold, then it is important to ask if games and play-based learning could encourage students to view their degrees as more than the requisite paperwork that allows them to look for jobs. Learning beyond curriculum One of the opportunities of using games in coursework is the ability to bring perspectives of game-makers and designers into the classroom. One such rare opportunity that we were offered this year was to welcome the makers of the virtual reality experience Assassins Creed NexusVR as part of a session that allowed students to engage with people from the industry. The session, delivered by Lisa Ridley, Senior AI programmer, at Ubisoft’s Reflections Studio in Newcastle, UK, went into great detail explaining how the iconic franchise Assassins Creed was reimagined as a virtual reality experience while also highlighting the challenges in making such an ambitious project playable on a device like Meta Quest 2 and 3. There was a lot more to be learnt from the Ubisoft team as students could pick up on aspects of marketing and promotion of games as well as approaches to the development and execution of social media campaigns to promote upcoming games. Policymakers and government are yet to engage with the gaming industry’s call to create necessary standards for game development, e-sports degrees and infrastructure for vocational and skill-based training However, at the end of the session, what caught me by surprise was not just the opportunity to learn from one of the largest game-makers in the world, but rather the sheer number of questions students wanted to ask. The interaction lasted for over an hour and spanned a wide variety of questions — most beyond the boundaries of the reading materials from the courses I had taught but within the domain of the larger discipline. The discussions and deliberations were both deep and nuanced as I watched how students adapted and bridged what was discussed in the classroom with what was being presented by the experts. If such interactions and commitments to learning are possible then we must ask our current education sector: If world-leading organisations and game-makers are willing to view their games as not just sites of play but as opportunities for teaching and learning, why are we holding back from creating the right openings and connections from such associations? Also, what more can educational institutions expect of their students beyond a self-driven desire to learn and an in-depth engagement with the materials of the course? Theory and Ideas Games and game-based content if imagined and complemented with theory and ideas in the right way can be used to teach much more than resource allocation and strategy building in business schools (as is the norm currently). In the process, it might instil in students a desire to carve their journeys of learning. If world-leading organisations and game-makers are willing to view their games as not just sites of play but as opportunities for teaching and learning, why are we holding back from creating the right openings and connections from such associations? In my decade-long time in higher education, I have relied on games to convey a wide variety of ideas — fromgames like Beecarbonize to help students visualise the extent of the climate crisis on our hands to more complex games like Detroit Become Human to get them to critically think of workers’ rights in the gig economy. As we begin to think about what education and institutions of higher learning mean and offer in the era of Generative AI, one of the key distinctions lies in the experience we offer. If it is a meaningful and value-driven experience, then few things push the boundary to the maximum the way games and play-based activities do. (The writer is a Lecturer of Communications, Digital Media Sociology at the University of Exeter, UK. He is the author of Gaming Culture(s) in India: Digital Play in Everyday Life and the just released,The 21st Century in a Hundred Games) Follow Us : Tags Digital Media Sociology Indian Students Lisa Ridley New Education Policy Related News Number of Indian students applying to UK universities drops 20%, reveals report Video games as art: Resisting crowdsourced review platforms, anti-woke culture Northern Arizona University in collaboration launches summer five-week program Excessive screen time weakens children’s vocabulary; video games most harmful: Study
FORT MYERS, Fla. (AP) — Dallion Johnson scored 25 points as FGCU beat Florida Tech 79-62 on Sunday. Johnson shot 9 for 16, including 6 for 12 from beyond the arc for the Eagles (4-8). Keeshawn Kellman added 14 points while shooting 6 of 8 from the field while he also had nine rebounds. Rahmir Barno shot 5 of 6 from the field and 2 for 3 from the line to finish with 12 points, while adding seven assists and six steals. The Panthers were led in scoring by Donovan Brown, who finished with 26 points, six rebounds and six assists. Can Kaan Turgut added 13 points and six rebounds for Florida Tech. Logan Allen also had nine points. FGCU visits Richmond in its next matchup on Saturday. The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar .
Five things to know about Panama Canal, in Trump's sights
( ) shares are starting the week on a positive note. In morning trade, the health imaging technology company's shares are up 1.5% to $251.90. What's happening? Investors have been buying the high-flying ASX tech stock on Monday following the release of an . According to the release, the company has signed a $30 million, seven-year contract with Duly Health and Care (DHC). It is the largest independent, multi-specialty physician-directed medical group in the Midwest of the United States. It notes that the DHC brand includes DuPage Medical Group, Quincy Medical Group, and The South Bend Clinic. It supports over 40 radiologists, 1,000 physicians, and 150 outpatient clinics. Based on a transactional licensing model, the contract will see Pro Medicus' cloud-engineered Visage 7 Enterprise Imaging Platform (Visage 7), including Visage 7 Open Archive and Visage 7 Workflow modules, implemented throughout DHC. This will provide a unified diagnostic imaging platform. Management expects the migration from DHC's legacy PACS archive and vendor neutral archive to Visage 7 Open Archive to complete during the second quarter of the 2025 calendar year. Planning for the rollout is to commence immediately and will be based on Visage's proven cloud-based implementation process. Management commentary Pro Medicus CEO's, Dr Sam Hupert, was pleased with the deal for a number of reasons. He said: Duly Health and Care is an important deal for us as they are in the private radiology/outpatient space, an area of the market where we are starting to see increased opportunity. They also join a long list of Visage 7 clients to opt for a fully cloud-engineered solution, which, as a result of our CloudPACS strategy, is becoming the standard in the North American healthcare IT market. Our pipeline remains strong and spans all market segments including academic medical centers, IDNs and the private/teleradiology market. As has been the case with many of our recent contracts, this deal is for our "full stack" comprising all three Visage products namely viewer, workflow and archive, a trend we see continuing. Should you buy Pro Medicus shares? Goldman Sachs is a fan of the company and recently put a buy rating and $278.00 price target on its shares. While the broker acknowledges that its shares are not cheap, it feels they deserve this premium valuation. It said: PME is not cheap, trading on 114x FY26E EV/EBITDA, but we highlight its revenue/margin outlook, unique cloud offering, and significant long-term opportunity. Additionally, with a focus on the US regulatory outlook, we believe MedTech is increasingly being evaluated as a safe haven within healthcare as it is generally more insulated from impending policy volatility.Los Angeles deputy mayor put on leave amidst FBI probe into bomb threat
DURHAM, N.H. (AP) — Kinkead Dent threw for 246 yards and ran for another 56 yards and a touchdown as UT Martin rolled to a 41-10 win over New Hampshire in an FCS first-round game on Saturday. The Skyhawks (9-4) advance to face unbeaten and top-seeded Montana State (12-0) in the second round. Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.
Germany paves the way for autonomous buses by 2026